The organic mixture Bisphenol A, or Bpa, is a tasteless component in polycarbonate plastics used in products ranging from baby and water bottles to the inside linings of food and beverage cans. A source of condition concerns since the 1930s, Bpa more recently was the subject of reports about adverse effects on laboratory animals in the late 1990s. And in 2008, reports questioning its safety started making headlines and led some retailers to remove Bpa-containing products from their shelves.
In this Q&A I'll write back considerable questions about the use of Bpa and its alternatives.
Baby Toys
Question: What are some of the alternatives to Bpa for the containers industry?
Lamaze Early Development Toy, Sir Prance A Lot Review
Lamaze Early Development Toy, Sir Prance A Lot Feature
- Squeaky knight
- Clacking rings
- Knottier activity legs
- Jingle
- Crinkle
Lamaze Early Development Toy, Sir Prance A Lot Overview
Learning Curve Sir Prance-A-Lot
Full of developmental features that capture baby's imagination and stimulate the senses, this toy features a squeaky knight, clacking rings, knottier activity legs, jingle and crinkle.
- Product Dimensions (inches): 8.75 (L) x 3.5 (W) x 8 (H)
- Age: 0 to 24 months
Available at Amazon Check Price Now!
Related Products
- Lamaze Play and Grow Mortimer the Moose Take Along Toy, Colors May Vary
- Lamaze Play and Grow Freddie the Firefly Take Along Toy
- Lamaze Play and Grow Jacques the Peacock Take Along Toy
- Lamaze Early Development Toy, Captain Calamari
- Lamaze Eddie the Elephant Play and Grow
Customer Reviews
*** Product Information and Prices Stored: Feb 22, 2012 23:30:07
Answer: For infant products and reusable water bottles, which have drawn the most attention from consumers, manufacturers are seeing at a wide range of alternative plastics including food-grade polypropylene, high-density polyethylene and new products such as Bpa-free co-polyester. Other alternatives contain aluminum, tempered glass and stainless steel.
From a canning perspective (including baby formula), many experts in the commerce pronounce that there are very few, if any, viable alternatives to Bpa-containing plastics that will be as versatile and practical and still contribute the food-safety benefits of Bpa-containing epoxy can linings. While at least one organic food victualer is selling beans in cans with a baked-on corn-based enamel lining, this lining has not proven suitable for highly acidic products like tomatoes. Food containers experts admit that farranging work is being done to find alternatives to Bpa. Some clubs are seeing back to reformulating lacquer technology used in cans before epoxy coatings became feasible in the 1970s. Because the canning commerce is very secretive about exact can lining compositions, determining either there are current industry-wide alternatives proves difficult. There are reports that some food clubs are exploring aluminum/polyethylene-lined cardboard containers while others are revisiting the use of glass jars for their products.
What has the reaction been since the Bpa controversy started making headlines?
Because there is obscuring and contrast over the science and within the marketplace, there have been a variety of reactions by the industry, by consumers and by the government. some trade and lobbying groups with an interest in Bpa and Bpa-containing products have created task soldiery and consortiums to address and inform consumers on what they believe are the myths and realities of Bpa. Similarly, many buyer and environmental groups have taken an opposing stance outlining and explaining the possible deleterious health-related effects of Bpa. Even the U.S. Government continues to be split with the Fda assuring consumers that Bpa is safe at low levels, while the National Institutes of condition maintains that there is some concern about Bpa's effects on humans even at low levels, especially on infant development.
Because there is no scientific, political or industry-wide consensus, change has come in a variety of ways. some clubs have voluntarily stopped producing toys, water bottles, baby bottles and food containers that contain Bpa. At the same time some large merchants have mandated that they will no longer sell these types of Bpa-containing products. New Jersey enacted legislation banning Bpa-containing food containers, toys, and baby bottles, but initiatives for similar bans in California and Minnesota have failed. Canada plans to eliminate Bpa-containing bottles and food containers nationwide.
In the canning industry, very little has changed thus far on a state or national level, in general due to the lack of viable alternatives. Can makers insist that there is not adequate evidence at this time to determine that Bpa is a condition risk at current evaluated exposure levels.
Do you think consumers' purchasing decisions will change?
Consumers are already changing, and retailers are replacing Bpa-containing products on their shelves. clubs like Wal-Mart and Toys-R-Us have either eliminated or plan to eliminate baby bottles, food containers and water bottles made from Bpa-containing polycarbonate from their shelves. With more possible legislation looming, it appears that for these products, a buyer will have much less of a option in the marketplace.
Consumer and environmental groups continue to advise buying products fresh or in alternative containers to cans and the media continues to react to the seemingly endless stream of conflicting reports on Bpa. Meanwhile, trade groups tied to Bpa production and canning stress their products are safe at low exposure levels. This leads to obscuring in the marketplace and when there is confusion, consumers commonly take a "better-to-be-safe-than-sorry" attitude, especially if there are viable practical alternatives.
How Bpa specifically affects consumers farranging continues to play out, but with the up-to-date Chinese melamine in milk and pet-food concerns and recalls for lead paint, the exploding markets for green and organic products and the general increase in awareness of salutary living in America, it is a safe bet that consumers are and will remain cautious as more studies linked to the effects of Bpa are evaluated. If the Fda eventually agrees with the Nih findings, Bpa's days may be numbered.
Are clubs allowed to label products free of Bisphenol A? If so, how much does that influence buyer purchase decisions?
Companies actually can label their products as Bisphenol-A free, and many are doing that right now, especially in the baby bottle/accessory, water bottle and food box markets. Nalgene, a company that put a brand-name on the reusable polycarbonate water bottle store is producing and labeling all of its products as Bpa-free. The organic food company Eden Organics sells beans in Bpa-free cans and is gaining a lot of publicity. clubs such as Gerber and Playtex are in the process of producing and marketing all of their baby bottle and accessories as Bpa-free. The private company Born Free is a rapidly growing company started in 2006 specifically to address the store of Bpa-free baby bottles and infant accessories.
For baby products and water bottles, it appears that the store is strongly favoring the switch to Bpa-free products. How this will work itself out in the end may be a matter of communal interest versus private interest with lawyers, activist groups and politicians on both sides doing what they can to educate or play off consumers' emotions. But if history is any indication, (similar issues arose with saccharin and more recently phthalates, the former being eventually declared safe decades after possible cancer concerns hit the media, and the safety of the latter still being evaluated by scientists and legislators), it is obvious that regardless of the scientific conclusions, there will continue to be a grand store for Bpa-free products as long as they are industrialized and marketed by the commerce and are practical and viable for the consumer.
Answers to indispensable Questions About Bisphenol AThanks To : baby toys kids watches
No comments:
Post a Comment